A call to action: 'Hands off VicHealth!'
One of Australia's most esteemed scientists and a global health champion, Sir Gustav Nossal, has issued a powerful plea to the Allan government. His message is clear: 'Just leave VicHealth alone.'
Nossal, a respected patron and founding chairman of VicHealth, is concerned about the government's proposal to dismantle this standalone agency and merge it into the Department of Health. With a wealth of experience and a keen eye on the public debate, Nossal believes that Victoria and Australia stand to lose a vital health promotion resource.
'It's a misguided cost-cutting measure,' he asserts. Nossal advocates for VicHealth to retain its independent status, with representation from all three political parties. He emphasizes its role in preventative medicine and public health, adding, 'In the fast-paced world of medical practice, it's easy to overlook research and fall into routine. VicHealth allows us to step back and make strategic investments.'
When asked about his message for the Victorian government, Nossal's response is direct: 'Be proud of VicHealth. Support it wholeheartedly.'
However, the government has a different perspective, describing VicHealth as outdated and no longer fit for its purpose. They argue that the health promotion landscape has evolved significantly over the past few decades, requiring innovative approaches.
Nossal's intervention adds weight to the growing calls from public health advocates for the government to rethink its plans. Professor John Catford, a former chief health officer and chair of VicHealth, has also urged the government to maintain VicHealth's unique position as an independent agency with guaranteed funding.
Catford highlights VicHealth's role as an innovator, thought leader, and evidence creator, working beyond traditional health department boundaries with various community groups, sports and arts organizations, councils, and the media. He believes that VicHealth's approach, with its authenticity and 'can-do-now' attitude, is hard to replicate within government structures.
Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas, in explaining the government's decision, stated that some of VicHealth's work is already being done by the government's local public health units. She emphasized the need to avoid waste and duplication.
Supporters of VicHealth, including former federal health minister Nicola Roxon and other former chairs, have launched a campaign called 'Save VicHealth.' With nearly 3000 signatures on an online petition, they warn that dismantling VicHealth will not achieve the hoped-for savings and will significantly reduce the effectiveness of public health initiatives in Victoria.
VicHealth is one of 29 public entities targeted for change by Premier Jacinta Allan and Treasurer Jaclyn Symes, based on an independent review of the Victorian Public Service. The proposed changes to the Tobacco Act, which are necessary to abolish VicHealth as a statutory authority, have not yet been introduced to parliament.
This debate raises important questions: Is it worth sacrificing an innovative and independent health promotion agency for the sake of cost-cutting? Can the government's local public health units truly replace the unique contributions of VicHealth? We invite you to share your thoughts and engage in this crucial discussion.
