Disabled people in England are facing a significant setback as the government scales back accessibility targets for new-build homes. This decision has sparked outrage, with campaigners accusing the government of betrayal and exclusion. But why is this happening, and what does it mean for the future of accessible housing? Let's dive in.
The government's proposal involves reducing the minimum percentage of new homes built to improved accessibility standards – specifically, the M4(2) standard, which includes features like step-free access and wider doorways – to 40%. This is a considerable drop from the previous commitment by the Conservative government to make all new homes meet this standard. And this is the part most people miss: the plans set no minimum target for wheelchair-accessible homes (M4(3)), which disability advocates argue should be at least 10%.
Mikey Erhardt from Disability Rights UK didn't mince words, calling it a "monumental reversal." He emphasized the disappointment and the feeling of being left out, questioning the government's commitment to equality for disabled individuals. Erhardt pointed out that the original plan to have 100% of new homes meet improved accessibility standards, with 10% specifically designed for wheelchair users, would have leveled the playing field for developers and signaled a real change in housing.
Millie Brown from the Centre for Ageing Better sees the 40% target as a step in the right direction, but acknowledges it's a step back from previous plans. She hopes local authorities will aim to exceed the minimum target.
The government's rationale, as stated in their proposed changes to the planning system, is to allow councils to set their own requirements for M4(2) based on local needs. The M4(2) standard ensures homes are adaptable for people with limited mobility, featuring step-free access, wider doors, and accessible toilets. Homes built to the M4(3) standard are fully wheelchair accessible, with ample turning spaces and accessible bathrooms and kitchens.
Here's where it gets controversial: while some local authorities, like London, have set ambitious targets ( 90% M4(2) and 10% M4(3)), accessibility rates vary drastically across the country. Research by the Centre for Ageing Better revealed that people in the East Midlands and the North East are significantly less likely to live in fully accessible homes compared to Londoners. Nationally, only 13% of homes in England are fully accessible.
The Housing Secretary, Steve Reed, frames the changes as part of a broader plan to "get Britain building." However, Mark Gale from the disability charity Sense expressed disappointment, highlighting how inaccessible housing can severely limit independence for disabled people. He emphasized the shortage of suitable housing, forcing some to live in homes that don't meet their needs.
So, what do you think? Is the government's move a necessary compromise, or a step backward? Do you believe local authorities should have more control over accessibility standards, or should there be a national mandate? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
